• <xmp id="aueum"><optgroup id="aueum"></optgroup>
  • CollectionDX Network

    Baikanfu

    Comments

    15 comments posted
    貴様らに名乗る名前はない!

    貴様らに名乗る名前はない!

    VF5SS's picture
    Posted by VF5SS on 15 December, 2011 - 23:06
    兄さん!

    兄さん!

    SpaceRunaway's picture
    Posted by SpaceRunaway on 16 December, 2011 - 00:11
    ロム兄さん!
    VF5SS's picture
    Posted by VF5SS on 16 December, 2011 - 10:25
    だ‐誰だ!

    だ‐誰だ!

    SpaceRunaway's picture
    Posted by SpaceRunaway on 16 December, 2011 - 14:01
    It's like, Russian Dolls with

    It's like, Russian Dolls with SD Robots. I can't help but feel the need to track down a set.

    Jmann's picture
    Posted by Jmann on 16 December, 2011 - 00:22
    Okay, I'm

    Okay, I'm impressed.

    Pose-able SD is always great. If it can transform, that's also a neat little trick. Combiners would be a nightmare to pull off and have all the modes still look decent enough both when separate and combined.
    But this-? I'm very surprised that they even tried it, much less that they accomplished their goal!

    EVA_Unit_4A's picture
    Posted by EVA_Unit_4A on 16 December, 2011 - 01:33
    Wow! WTF happened on that

    Wow! WTF happened on that sword?

    VZMK2's picture
    Posted by VZMK2 on 16 December, 2011 - 08:01
    when

    when I see a cool piece like this for round $100-130, it really makes me question what the heck we're paying for with the high prices of other recent bots and toys... Just look at all the engineering on this. dag!

    The Big R's picture
    Posted by The Big R on 16 December, 2011 - 10:48
    a new high

    Your pictures always put mine to shame, but this is the tops. They are all incredible! Great job!
    The figure is not my bag, keep up the incredible work.

    ....still think you should give everyone who does reviews a seminar or something during the next CDX meeting...

    AJProDie-Cast's picture
    Posted by AJProDie-Cast on 16 December, 2011 - 14:06
    If I had a photo tent like

    If I had a photo tent like most of the rest of the CDX staff already does, I'm sure my photos would turn out a little better; I've known that for years.

    EVA_Unit_4A's picture
    Posted by EVA_Unit_4A on 16 December, 2011 - 15:41
    Those are definetly nice

    Those are definetly nice shots and a good depth of field on the 2 shots of the bots in front of each other. You dont necessarily need a light box.Its all about lighting in general, just get a basic sheet and play with the angles of lights and what not. I shoot alot of figures and dont use a light box.

    NEOGETTER's picture
    Posted by NEOGETTER on 16 December, 2011 - 17:26
    Thank for the picture

    Thank for the picture compliments. Honestly, you guys would laugh if you saw my setup. I don't have any light boxes or anything fancy. like you said It's all about light placement/diffusing light and settings on the camera.

    chachipower's picture
    Posted by chachipower on 16 December, 2011 - 21:09
    Sad

    I have to say , I really enjoy your reviews !FANTASTIC!!!!!!, but unfortunately I wont be buying this set. I got tired of paying big $ for toys full of QC issues =(. I wish we could go back to times when you can throw one of these toys against the wall, and not a scratch.

    GALACTICO's picture
    Posted by GALACTICO on 17 December, 2011 - 06:14
    Thanks!, Well thats the

    Thanks!,

    Well thats the thing those toys in the past were just that..toys. Their design was function before form, so things could be made a certain way to withstand abuse at the expense of accuracy, now they are no longer really toys and designed to look good. Still, no excuse for bad QC.

    chachipower's picture
    Posted by chachipower on 17 December, 2011 - 16:08
    "I wish we could go back to

    "I wish we could go back to times when you can throw one of these toys against the wall, and not a scratch."

    This time did not exist.

    VF5SS's picture
    Posted by VF5SS on 19 December, 2011 - 15:43
     
    国产成人丝袜精品视频